Questions & Answers about DeeLexy

General-purpose AI chats, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, can answer legal questions, but they usually work as universal conversational interfaces. The answer often remains standalone text, while you have to verify sources, move documents manually, rebuild context, and make sure materials from different tasks are not mixed together.

DeeLexy works differently. It is Legal Vertical AI — a legal-focused AI system designed for legal tasks, legal documents, and matter-based work.

Key differences of DeeLexy:

• Legal focus. The platform organizes work around a specific legal task, not a random chain of messages.
• Grounded answers. You can see which documents, legal sources, and task materials were used to prepare the answer.
• Context control. During the work process, you can include or exclude specific documents from the analysis to adjust the AI’s focus.
• Task separation. Materials related to one legal task are stored and analyzed in their own context instead of being mixed with other matters or chats.
• Built-in legal context setup. The logic for working with documents, sources, and task materials is built into the platform, so you do not need to keep the AI within the scope of the legal task through complex prompts.

General-purpose AI models are powerful across many topics, but legal work requires more than well-written text. In law, it matters why a conclusion was reached: which contract clauses were considered, which rules were applied, which facts were taken into account, and whether the context of different situations was kept separate.

In a regular chat, an answer may look convincing, but it can be difficult to verify quickly: sources, documents, and the logic behind material selection are not always visible to you.

DeeLexy addresses this at the product level. It adds a legal workspace on top of language model capabilities: legal context, matter materials, source management, document-aware work, and a verifiable basis for the answer.

DeeLexy does not work like a simple input window connected to a general-purpose model. The platform uses its own legal context layer: legal sources, user documents, matter materials, work history, and rules for selecting relevant information.

When you ask a question, DeeLexy determines which materials are relevant to the task and forms a focused legal context for the AI. As a result, the answer is based not only on the model’s general knowledge, but also on the specific documents, sources, and facts of the current situation.

This architecture helps reduce the risk of unsupported conclusions and makes the answer more focused, verifiable, and connected to your situation.

Legal Vertical AI is an AI system designed not for every possible task, but for one professional domain: law, legal documents, legal risk assessment, and matter-based work.

In DeeLexy, this vertical approach is built into the product architecture. The platform works with legal sources, facts, documents, matter materials, analysis modes, and grounded answers.

This approach does not replace general-purpose language models. DeeLexy may use strong frontier models under the hood, but it directs their capabilities through legal context, sources, documents, and task separation logic.

The Case-Centric approach means that work in DeeLexy is organized around a specific legal task or matter, not around an endless and fragmented conversation.

One case is a separate legal context: a contract, dispute, claim, counterparty review, litigation issue, corporate task, or another legal situation.

Inside a case, DeeLexy keeps related documents, facts, AI outputs, sources, drafts, and work history. This helps separate different tasks from one another: materials from one matter are not used when analyzing another situation.

DeeLexy does not simply provide a finished text. It shows the basis of the answer. If user documents, legal sources, or matter materials were used to prepare a conclusion, you can see this in the interface.

The right-side panel displays the sources, documents, and context the AI relied on. This helps you understand why a particular conclusion was made, which materials were considered, and whether the focus of the analysis needs to be adjusted.

You can control the context by including or excluding specific documents from the analysis, so the AI considers only the materials that are relevant to the task.

DeeLexy is designed for more than a simple “question — answer” format. The platform helps you work with a legal task at different stages.

Initial review: understand the situation, identify key facts, determine possible risks, and see which documents may be missing.

Document analysis: review a contract, claim, litigation materials, offer terms, internal policy, counterparty letter, or another legally significant document.

Position preparation: structure arguments, compare facts with documents, formulate possible actions, and prepare a basis for further work.

Document drafting: prepare a draft letter, claim, response, contract, explanation, application, or another legal text.

Matter management: add new materials, return to the matter later, and continue working in the same context.

DeeLexy is developing toward Agentic AI — workflows where AI helps not only answer questions, but also perform sequences of work steps under your control.

These workflows may include preparing document sets, working through task chains, reviewing new materials, controlling context, and automating selected stages of legal work.

Legally significant actions remain under human control. DeeLexy can prepare, analyze, structure, and suggest the next step, but important decisions and confirmations remain with you.

DeeLexy is built for people and teams who deal with legal questions, documents, and legal routine: individuals, founders, business owners, companies, lawyers, executives, and teams.

For businesses, executives, and individual users, DeeLexy helps understand legal situations, clarify complex wording, identify risks in documents, prepare questions for a lawyer, and organize materials into a clear structure.

For lawyers and in-house legal teams, DeeLexy can support routine stages of work: initial analysis, draft preparation, fact structuring, contradiction spotting, and working with matter materials.

No. DeeLexy does not replace a qualified lawyer, attorney, notary, or other professional legal specialist.

The platform helps analyze information, work with documents, identify risks, prepare drafts, and organize legal context. However, final legal decisions, litigation strategy, filing or signing documents, assessing consequences, and actions in complex or disputed situations remain with a human.

The goal of DeeLexy is not to remove the expert from legal work, but to give you or a specialist a more prepared, structured, and verifiable context for decision-making.

DeeLexy reduces the risk of unsupported conclusions by working within an isolated legal context for the task. Unlike a regular AI chat, the platform does not rely only on a free-form response from a general-purpose model. It works with controlled layers of information.

The analysis may include:

1. the parameters and history of the specific legal task;
2. uploaded documents;
3. materials of the current matter;
4. legal sources available in the platform’s legal knowledge base;
5. previously prepared conclusions and drafts, if they belong to the same context.

DeeLexy narrows the AI’s focus to materials connected with the specific situation. This helps reduce broad speculation, unsupported references, and the mixing of unrelated tasks.

At the same time, the platform does not make AI absolutely error-free. Final control, especially in legally significant situations, remains with the human user.

The materials used for the answer are displayed next to the response — in the right-side sources panel and related workspace elements.

If the AI relied on a contract, act, claim, letter, or another uploaded file, you can see which document was involved in the analysis. If the conclusion is connected to legal sources, the interface shows the relevant rules, case law, guidance, or other materials used to prepare the answer.

This allows you to quickly check whether the analysis is complete. If an important document was not considered, you can add it to the context, include it in the analysis, or ask a follow-up question about a specific fragment.

DeeLexy works with several types of materials within one legal task.

User documents: contracts, agreements, business correspondence, claims, acts, offers, internal policies, and other uploaded files.

Matter materials: facts, timelines, related documents, previously prepared conclusions, and working materials for the specific task.

Legal sources: legal rules, guidance, case law, and other materials available in the platform’s legal context.

Work history: previous questions, answers, drafts, and intermediate outputs, if they are related to the current matter or task.

The main principle of DeeLexy is not to use everything at once, but to use only the materials connected with your specific situation.

Yes. In DeeLexy, you can exclude a specific document from the active analysis context.

When a document is excluded, the file remains in the task or matter materials, but the AI does not use it for preparing future answers until it is included again. This allows you to keep the document in the workspace while temporarily removing it from the analysis.

This control is useful when a document is outdated, belongs to an alternative scenario, distracts from the current analysis, or should not influence the current legal position.

DeeLexy works with different grounds for analysis.

An answer based on user documents relies on uploaded files and matter materials. It helps analyze specific wording, facts, deadlines, obligations, risks, and contradictions inside user documents.

An answer based on legal sources connects the situation with legal rules, case law, guidance, and other legal materials available in the platform.

In complex tasks, these approaches can be combined: DeeLexy compares user documents with the legal context to show not only what the document says, but also its possible legal significance.

DeeLexy works with legal sources available in the platform’s legal knowledge base and connected context. The knowledge base is updated and expanded with new materials: legislation, case law, guidance, and other legal sources.

At the same time, law changes quickly. New laws, amendments, court positions, administrative guidance, and local practice may appear more often than any information system can update.

That is why DeeLexy is best used as a legal AI workspace for analyzing, comparing, and structuring legal information around a specific task. The more accurately you provide context — documents, facts, correspondence, deadlines, positions of the parties — the better the AI can connect legal sources with the real situation and prepare a useful conclusion.

In critical scenarios — litigation, high-value transactions, filing documents, signing contracts — the generated conclusion should be additionally checked against official sources or reviewed with a qualified specialist.

Legal analysis depends on more than the text of a law or a document. Facts, applicable jurisdiction, deadlines, procedural status, exceptions, case law, conflicts between sources, and the details of the specific situation all matter.

Even if the AI used relevant materials, an error may still occur because of incorrect interpretation of facts, incomplete context, an outdated document, disputed application of a rule, or a missing important circumstance.

That is why DeeLexy focuses not on promising absolute accuracy, but on verification: you can see the basis of the answer, clarify the context, manage documents, and pass prepared materials to a qualified legal professional.

An AI legal answer should be checked through several steps.

1. Check the sources. See which documents, rules, and materials were used to prepare the answer.
2. Check the context. Make sure the AI considered the correct dates, amounts, documents, jurisdiction, type of dispute, and factual circumstances.
3. Check applicability. Even a correct rule may not apply to a specific situation because of exceptions, deadlines, or matter-specific details.
4. Use the answer as pre-analysis. In important matters, treat the DeeLexy output as a prepared analytical basis, not as a final legal decision.
5. Bring in a specialist where risk is high. Litigation strategy, high-value transactions, signing documents, and actions with serious consequences require professional legal judgment.

DeeLexy helps collect, verify, and structure legal context faster, but the final decision in legally significant matters remains with a human.

Modern AI models can produce very convincing responses. But in law, a convincing formulation is not the same as a correct legal conclusion.

Verification helps you see which materials influenced the answer, whether an important document was missed, whether unrelated tasks were mixed, and whether the logic of the analysis can be trusted.

That is why DeeLexy shows not only the final text, but also its basis: documents, sources, matter materials, and the context the AI worked with.

Use a chat when you need to quickly understand a question, get an initial explanation, test an idea, ask a follow-up, or start working without preparing a formal structure first.

For example, chat is useful when you want to understand a contract clause, assess a general risk, ask a question about a counterparty letter, clarify a legal term, or get an initial orientation on a situation.

Chat is convenient for starting work. You do not need to know in advance how the task should be structured, which documents will be needed, or what the situation may develop into.

Create a matter when a legal task requires continuation, accumulation of materials, and the ability to return to it later.

This may include a dispute with a counterparty, contract review, claim preparation, litigation issue, corporate task, transaction support, or another situation involving documents, facts, deadlines, party positions, and several stages of work.

A matter helps keep structure. All documents, conclusions, sources, drafts, and work history related to the task remain in one place.

Yes. In DeeLexy, you can start with a regular question in a chat and later continue the work as a full legal task.

This matters because not every situation looks like a “matter” from the beginning. Sometimes you first ask a simple question, then add a contract, then correspondence appears, then deadlines, risks, the other party’s position, and the need to prepare a document.

DeeLexy supports this natural workflow: from a simple question to structured work with materials.

Task materials are everything related to a specific legal question: documents, facts, sources, AI conclusions, drafts, work history, and your clarifications.

Matter materials are a more structured set of those materials inside a dedicated matter. They help preserve context so you do not need to rebuild the analysis each time you return to the task.

In legal work, materials matter. A contract, letter, date, amount, deadline, clause wording, or the other party’s position can change the conclusion. DeeLexy connects these elements to the specific task.

DeeLexy separates legal tasks: each task is handled within its own context.

Documents, facts, and conclusions related to one situation are not used when analyzing another task. For example, materials from a landlord dispute are not used when reviewing a contract with a different counterparty.

This separation helps reduce contextual errors: the AI takes into account materials of the current task and does not carry facts from one situation into another.

Documents uploaded to a chat become part of the working task if they are relevant to the current question.

You can ask questions about the uploaded file, request an explanation of a clause, identify risks, prepare a response, extract key facts, or use the document as a basis for further work.

If the task develops and becomes more complex, materials from the chat can be used to continue the work in a more structured format.

Documents uploaded to a matter become part of that matter’s materials. They remain next to the task and can be considered in later questions, analysis, draft preparation, and work on the legal position.

You can manage these documents: include them in the analysis, temporarily exclude them from the context, add new materials, or remove files that are no longer needed.

This is useful for longer tasks where documents appear gradually: first a contract, then correspondence, then an act, a claim, the counterparty’s response, or litigation materials.

Yes. One of the key ideas of DeeLexy is the ability to return to a legal task later without rebuilding the context from scratch.

If documents, conclusions, sources, and drafts are saved within a task or matter, you can continue from where you stopped.

This is especially important for legal processes that are rarely resolved in a single question: negotiations, disputes, contract reviews, document preparation, and ongoing matters may continue for days, weeks, or longer.

Yes. In DeeLexy, you can work on several legal tasks in parallel.

For example, you can separately manage a lease review, a counterparty dispute, claim preparation, and an internal corporate question. Each task has its own context, documents, and work history.

This approach helps prevent materials from being mixed and keeps the workspace clear: you understand which documents belong to which situation and which conclusions were prepared for each task.

Chat helps you start without knowing the legal form of the task in advance.

You can describe the situation in ordinary language: what happened, which document needs to be reviewed, what is unclear in a letter, or which risk seems concerning. DeeLexy helps turn an unstructured description into a clearer legal structure: facts, documents, questions, possible risks, and next steps.

This is especially useful if you do not have legal training. You do not need to know the correct legal terms, type of dispute, or document format before starting.

A matter helps treat a legal task as a process, not as a one-off conversation.

Inside a matter, you can keep documents, facts, sources, conclusions, drafts, and work history. This makes it easier to return to the task, add new circumstances, refine the position, prepare documents, and gradually build a working legal basis.

For lawyers, businesses, and users dealing with complex or long-running situations, a matter becomes the center for managing legal context.

If you need to ask a quick question, review a document, or get an initial orientation, start with a chat.

If the task is important, long-running, connected with several documents, deadlines, a dispute, a transaction, or preparation of a legal position, create a matter.

A simple rule: chat is convenient for starting; matter is better for structured legal work. If the task grows, it can be continued in a more structured format.

You control the documents in the active context.

A document can be included in the analysis when it is important for the answer. It can also be excluded if it is outdated, belongs to another version of negotiations, contains an alternative scenario, or is simply not needed for the current question.

When a document is excluded, it remains in the task materials, but the AI no longer takes it into account when preparing the next answers. You can include the document again at any time.

No. DeeLexy separates legal tasks and their materials.

Documents, facts, conclusions, and history from one matter are not used when analyzing another task. For example, materials from a landlord dispute will not be used when reviewing a contract with a different counterparty.

This separation helps protect the context: the AI takes into account only the materials related to the current task and does not carry facts from one matter into another.

Storage and participation in analysis are different things.

A document can remain stored in the matter materials without being used in AI answers if you have excluded it from the active context.

This is useful in real legal work. For example, you can keep an old version of a contract in the matter materials but exclude it from the analysis so the AI works only with the current version.

DeeLexy separates uploaded documents from generated documents.

Uploaded documents are your files: contracts, acts, claims, letters, scans, offers, litigation materials, and other source documents.

Generated documents are materials prepared with AI assistance: draft letters, claims, explanations, contracts, summaries, reports, and other working texts.

You can open documents, use them in analysis, exclude them from the active context, delete them from the workspace, and keep them connected to a specific legal task.

Yes. In DeeLexy, you can delete a specific document while keeping the task itself.

For example, you can delete an outdated file but keep the chat, matter, discussion history, AI conclusions, and generated materials. This is useful when a document is no longer needed, but the overall work context should remain available.

Deleting a document is not the same as deleting the entire legal task.

When a matter is deleted, the entire workspace connected to that task is deleted: documents, materials, work history, and generated data related to the matter.

Before this action, DeeLexy shows a confirmation so you understand exactly what will be deleted.

This is different from deleting a single document. If you delete only a file, the matter remains. If you delete the matter, the connected context is deleted with it.

No. User legal documents and matter materials are not used to train AI models without separate consent.

Files uploaded to DeeLexy are used to work with your specific task: analysis, answer preparation, draft generation, and saving matter materials.

If additional service improvement or analytics modes become available in the future, they will be described separately and enabled only under clear terms.

DeeLexy is built as a legal AI workspace where the protection of documents and task materials is a core part of the product.

The platform separates the contexts of different tasks, does not mix documents between matters, allows you to control which materials participate in analysis, and provides tools for deleting data from the workspace.

To protect information, DeeLexy uses technical security measures such as access control, secure data transmission, and encryption of data at rest and in transit.

The main idea is simple: you understand which materials are stored in the service, which participate in the AI answer, which can be excluded from analysis, and which can be deleted.

Fast is a quick legal review mode. It is not only for simple questions. Fast is useful when you need a high-quality, focused, and more compact answer without lengthy reasoning. If documents, sources, or matter materials are connected to the task, Fast takes them into account when preparing the answer.

Expert is an extended legal analysis mode. It is suitable when you need more detailed reasoning, developed arguments, comparison of several factors, risk review, and deeper work on a legal position.

Consilium is an extended mode for complex tasks that require more careful checking, comparison of arguments, and additional depth of analysis. It is useful when the cost of a mistake is higher and you need not just a quick answer, but a more balanced review.

Auto is an automatic mode in which DeeLexy helps select the appropriate level of analysis for the task. You do not need to understand all modes in advance: the system is guided by the complexity of the question, the type of materials, and the required depth of the answer.

Expert Standard and Expert Premium are levels of expert analysis within the Expert mode.

Expert Standard is suitable for regular legal work: document analysis, risk review, draft preparation, claim review, and everyday legal questions.

Expert Premium is designed for more complex tasks that require extended review, more attention to detail, and deeper legal analysis. This level is available in higher plans or within additional volume.

For you, the logic is simple: Expert is the expert mode, while the specific level of analysis depends on your plan, available features, and type of task.

Web Research is a research tool for finding and checking information from external sources. It is useful when a task requires up-to-date context, additional information, or verification beyond the already uploaded documents and available legal knowledge base.

Deep Research is a tool for in-depth research of a complex task. It is useful when a task requires longer analysis, comparison of different sources, structuring of materials, and a detailed result.

Web Research and Deep Research are not ordinary quick answers. They require more time and more AI credit usage, so they are not available in every plan or in the same volume.

Use Fast when you need a quick, accurate, and compact legal review: to understand a situation, check a document, get a practical orientation, identify a risk, ask a follow-up question, or quickly compare facts with connected materials.

Use Expert when you need not only the final recommendation, but also more detailed legal reasoning: arguments, alternative positions, risks, exceptions, comparison of several documents, or preparation of a more developed legal position.

A simple rule: Fast is for a quick and focused answer. Expert is for more detailed explanation, deeper argumentation, and more complex legal work.

Consilium should be used for complex or sensitive tasks where extended analysis and more careful checking of the conclusion are needed.

For example, Consilium may be useful when preparing a position in a dispute, assessing strong and weak arguments, comparing several possible actions, reviewing a complex contract, or working on a situation where it is important to reduce the risk of a rushed conclusion.

This mode is not needed for every question. It is best used where the cost of a mistake is higher and the task requires deeper legal work.

Different modes require different levels of computational resources.

A compact answer to a focused question usually requires fewer resources. Expert analysis, document work, source comparison, argument checking, or in-depth research require more processing steps and more AI computation.

That is why AI credits are not counted one-to-one with messages or requests. One fast review and one deep research task may use different amounts of the available limit.

DeeLexy modes and tools differ by depth of analysis, computational load, and purpose.

Fast review, expert analysis, Consilium, Web Research, and Deep Research require different levels of resources. That is why advanced capabilities may be available only in certain plans or in a limited volume.

This approach helps keep a balance between plan cost, available AI credits, and the types of tasks you solve in DeeLexy.

Choose Fast when you need a quick and compact legal review with the connected context taken into account: documents, task materials, and available sources.

Choose Expert when detailed reasoning matters: arguments, risks, exceptions, comparison of options, analysis of several documents, or preparation of a legal position.

Use Consilium for complex and sensitive tasks where additional checking of the conclusion and a more balanced analysis are needed.

Use Web Research when you need to find or verify information from external sources. Use Deep Research when you need in-depth research of a complex topic with a detailed result.

If you are not sure which mode to choose, use Auto: DeeLexy will help select the appropriate level of analysis for the task.

AI credits are your monthly computational allowance in DeeLexy.

They are used when you ask questions, analyze documents, use expert modes, run source search, request multi-model review, or perform deep research.

AI credits are not counted one-to-one with your requests. Simple questions usually use fewer credits, while deeper analysis, document work, source search, multi-model review, and deep research use more.

Because different tasks require different depth of processing.

A compact answer to a focused question usually requires fewer credits. Contract analysis, work with several documents, source search, extended legal reasoning, multi-model review, or deep research require more steps and more AI computation.

That is why two actions may both look like “one request” in the interface, but use different amounts of AI credits.

Some operations have separate limits because they require significantly more resources than a fast legal review.

For example, advanced expert review, Consilium, Web Research, Deep Research, and large document review may be limited separately. This helps keep the service stable and distribute computational capacity between different types of tasks.

This means you may still have AI credits available while the limit for a specific mode or tool has already been reached.

If your AI credits run out, DeeLexy limits new operations that require additional credits.

You can wait for the next billing period, move to a higher plan, or purchase additional volume if this option is available for your subscription.

You can check what exactly has run out in Limits and remaining usage: general AI credits, the limit for a specific mode, or access to a particular feature.

If the limit for a specific mode or tool runs out, DeeLexy limits that specific operation, even if you still have AI credits available.

For example, you may still have AI credits for regular questions, but the limit for advanced expert review, Consilium, Web Research, or a certain type of document review may already be exhausted.

This is not a billing error. It means your plan includes both monthly AI credits and separate limits for heavier capabilities.

Free is designed for a first look at DeeLexy. It lets you ask your first questions, get a short review of your situation, and try a small document preview. Full document analysis and advanced modes are not included in the free volume.

Start is suitable for personal legal questions and smaller legal tasks: a dispute with a bank, store, utility provider, or employer, a refund request, review of a small contract, or drafting a simple letter.

Pro is designed for regular legal work: contract reviews, preparation of claims, complaints, and draft documents, handling several legal situations, and working with documents for a founder, freelancer, small business, or self-employed professional. Pro includes broader limits and selected advanced capabilities.

Premium is intended for complex matters, larger documents, legal strategy, contract work, and professional or near-daily use. This plan includes more AI credits, advanced expert analysis, and more capabilities for complex scenarios.

Deep Research, Consilium, and large document analysis are heavier operations.

They require more time, computation, and internal processing: DeeLexy analyzes more materials, compares sources, checks arguments, structures the conclusion, and may use several stages of research or multi-model review.

That is why these capabilities are not counted like a regular fast question and have separate limits inside the plan.

Yes. Additional volume may be available for paid subscriptions.

You can purchase additional AI credits for work during the current billing period or separate Top-Ups for advanced capabilities such as Expert Premium or Consilium.

Purchasing additional volume does not change your plan. It adds more capacity within the current period and under the current access conditions.

No. Additional volume applies to the current billing period and does not carry over to the next month.

Purchasing additional volume helps cover increased workload here and now: extra questions, document analysis, Web Research, or advanced expert reviews within the current period.

When a new period starts, the main volume renews according to the terms of your active plan.

When you move to a higher plan, new functions and modes available in the selected plan become available to you.

At the same time, the current period volume is recalculated proportionally to the remaining time in the period, rather than simply being replaced with the full monthly volume of the new plan.

This means an upgrade opens the capabilities of the higher plan, while your current available volume depends on the recalculation rules at the time of the plan change.

Priority processing helps place your task into processing faster compared with the regular queue, if this benefit is included in your plan.

But it does not mean every task is completed instantly. A complex document, deep research, Consilium, or a large legal task still requires time for analysis.

Priority affects processing order, but it does not remove the technical complexity of the operation itself.

If you want to take a first look at DeeLexy and ask your first questions, Free is a good starting point.

If you handle personal legal questions and occasionally review small documents, Start is the logical entry plan.

If legal work appears regularly — contracts, claims, documents, several situations in parallel — Pro is usually a better fit.

If your tasks are complex, documents are larger, work is near-daily, or you need advanced expert analysis, Premium is the stronger option.

A simple rule: the more documents you have, the more complex the tasks are, and the more you need deeper modes, the higher the plan should be.